> We use some very memory constrained linux thin clients (down to 64 MB > RAM) and we noticed that 0.8.2 used about 14 MB (virtual size) and 1.0.1 > (current version from git) goes up to about 76 MB - of course the poor > little boxes freeze or crash or show other strange behavior then :-D > Is this increase in memory consumption normal and to be expected because > of all this wonderful features you squeezed in in the last few months or > could this be some kind of memory leak?
Thanks Roman, I'm a FreeRDP developer and I agree with you 100%. We need to still run on 64 MB and even less. I'm met with resistance from other developers on this topic. Help me make a case for running FreeRDP on low memory devices. Do you know that a RemoteFX encoder, bulk compressor, NSCodec encoder, etc are all building and talking up memory on tiny arm devices when that code will never run!! If fact, it should be the other way around, developers should have to make a case for why these things are build in with no way to turn them off. Jay ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
