On 4/30/05, Dario Freni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've published some ideas I have for the next major release of the > toolkit. In my humble opinion it really need to be reengineered and > rewrited from scratch. >
One of my major pains in working with FreeSBIE for more than a year now is the lack of error recognition and handling in the scripts. As one example that's fresh in my memory because I ran into it this week, if you have broken or missing package(s), it'll say so in the output if you're watching it, but if you don't notice that, the script finishes as if everything is fine. I've seen from other posts on this list that others have had problems with missing packages, so I'm certainly not the only one who's ran into it. If you don't watch the messages scroll by, and don't know what to go back and look for, it's difficult to know what happened. That's just one example, I've run into similar things in the past with the same root issue. Some good error recognition and handling in FreeSBIE 2 would be much appreciated! Regards, -Chris -- FreeSBIE mailing list (http://www.freesbie.org)
