On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:35:29PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:37:45AM +0100, Matteo Riondato wrote: > > unionfs as it is in RELENG_6 is everything but stable in the middle > > run, and sometimes even in the short run. Daichi Goto has a working > > patch that fixes it, but I don't want to use unionfs now, for two > > reasons: > > Does unionfs in CURRENT work to your liking? Daichi's patches solve a lot > of problems, but we still have some reports of issues from Kris Kennaway, > especially when running on SMP systems or under load.
I only tested unionfs in -CURRENT once, because I was quite busy, but IIRC it worked well enough to use a FreeSBIE system with unionfs enabled. > Until we iron out those issues, I don't want to merge CURRENT unionfs > to RELENG_6. I agree. Best Regards -- Matteo Riondato FreeBSD Committer (http://www.freebsd.org) G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org)
pgpmDT56d2ntC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- FreeSBIE mailing list (http://www.freesbie.org)
