Hi, > I've encountered a problem with our handling of the stack. I must admit > I'm very surprised that this bug hasn't surfaced before: When doing > multiple sends, each send must not frob the stack of the previous one. So all of the allocations accumulate, and the last of the methods sent for in the list frees all of the memory allocated by its predecessors? llap, Christoph
- Re: Multiple sends Lars Skovlund
- Re: Multiple sends Christopher T. Lansdown
- Re: Multiple sends Christoph Reichenbach
- Multiple sends Lars Skovlund
- Re: Multiple sends Christoph Reichenbach
- Re: Multiple sends Lars Skovlund
