----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:57 PM
Subject: [freesci-develop] Re: SDL
> even planing for that much coverage. It could run on X, BeOS, MacOS,
Windows,
> Amiga, Qnx-RTOS, FreeBSD, et al. without haveing to do anything more than
a
> recompile! Pretty cool, huh?
*nitpick mode*
FreeBSD is a BSD UNIX flavour (IMO, the best there is :D), and uses generic
XFree86... therefore, what do you mean it'll run under FreeBSD? FreeSCI
currently works nicely on my FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE box with XFree 3.3.6.
--Rink
>
> Stuffed Crust wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:40:03PM +0200, Rickard Lind wrote:
> > > Recently a friend of mine tried to make FreeSCI work on a portable
MacOS-X
> > > computer... it involved too much work compiling X for him to care
about
> > > really giving it a shot. His suggestion was SDL (Simple DirectMedia
Layer)
> > > which makes sense since it wraps gfx, sound, and input.
> >
> > Not sure about SDL's sound framework (just PCM, or MIDI too?) but I
> > think a SDL gfx/input layer would be a good idea.
> >
> > Hmm. I wonder what kinds of gfx primitives it supports. Time to do
> > some reading up on its API. :)
> >
> > - Pizza
> > --
> > Solomon Peachy
pizzaATfucktheusers.org
> > I ain't broke, but I'm badly bent. ICQ#
1318344
> > Patience comes to those who wait.
> > ...It's not "Beanbag Love", it's a "Transanimate Relationship"...
>
>
>
