[freesci-develop] Re: cvs: cvsuser

[Ravi]

Howdy.

At 02:48 PM 7/15/01 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>re-wrote how the patch.003 is loaded.  Now is should be correct for both
>versions of the patch.003 file.

Hmm, I didn't know there were multiple versions. Could you give me the
names of a couple games in both versions?

>It seems that the second operator in each instrument definition doesn't
>neceessarily follow the same limit conventions that the first one does.

Indeed, but this should (I think) be limited to fields that aren't actually
operator specific. The alrogithm field, for example, is a channel setting
that only needs to be included once. The second operator stores other data,
but I haven't probed that too deeply. I'd be happy to take another look
when I have the time (probably next weekend).

Cheers,
Ravi.