Hi Stuffed! You wrote:
> I highly doubt shaftnet will ever have bandwidth problems per se (it > hooks into an OC12! == 622Mbps) but depending on where you are on the > planet, the routes make a huge difference. This is probably the same with square: it's on a >1Gb backbone. > > Of course, for CVS, other things like local I/O performance > > (writing/reading from HD, making diffs etc.) is also relevant, as would be > > regular backups. As is the continuing availability of the service, which, > > as has been pointed out, might be questionable for (3). > > shaft.shaftnet.org is a K6-233 and /home is a pair of RAID1 UW SCSI > drives. So it's a little more reliable than the average bear, though > its CPU speed is a little prehistoric by today's standards. I can have > it back up elsewhere, though it's not currently doing that (its backup > machine proved to be a little unreliable.. heh heh) Square's a dual P2-550. CVS is on a normal IDE (non-raid) disk, but it is backuped every night. -- Kind regards, +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce | |--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire? | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
