Hi,
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Stuffed Crust wrote: > </delurk> > I do have the framework for a PCM subsystem, but it kinda hit a brick > wall a while back when it came time to actually make it do anything. > (I realized it would have taken far more work than I had time) NP, you're not the only one here who was hit by that recently ;-) > My plan was to use SDL, taking advantage of the nifty SDL_mixer library > to do the gritty stuff, like, um, sample rate adjusting and mixing. This > in effect would require SDL for PCM output, which I don't see as an > inherently bad thing, given that it'll eliminate the need for > OSS/Alsa/Win32 PCM output drivers anyway, though of course, those could > be created if desired. As long as it can be built without PCM (or mixed PCM) support on non-SDL, that'd be fine. Wrapping the functions would be helpful, BTW (just in case). llap, Christoph
