On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 10:04:10PM +1030, Alex Angas wrote:
> 1. Make everything highly generic by using song iterators to process every
> level of sound.
> - positive: very versatile
> - negative: maybe overkill at this stage
I agree. I also think that it will likely remain overkill given that we
aren't going to support more than a handful of mostly-unique sound
devices (adlib[emu], gmidi, mt32, mt32gm)
> 2. Have a new MCI-only sound server that bypasses the lower levels so they
> don't need to be changed.
> - positive: doesn't affect low levels
> - negative: no mt32gm mapping
Obviously it's a fairly negative negative, as far as negatives go.
> Some form of (1) sounds like it will be required, but perhaps not so extreme
> right now. I'm in favour of a combination of options - using option (2) and
> also a form of (1) that only goes down to the mt32gm mapping level rather
> than the device level is used.
Sounds good; I like it.
..sorry about my absense lately, but works' been rather um, interesting.
Little time to goof off with fun sound code. :)
- Pizza
--
Solomon Peachy pizzaATfucktheusers.org
I ain't broke, but I'm badly bent. ICQ# 1318344
Patience comes to those who wait.
...It's not "Beanbag Love", it's a "Transanimate Relationship"...
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8V10zysXuytMhc5ERAmlUAJ9KXrzdKG4jLqvn4pTgl+9tNOktDQCeOc2n
eNTPoeE9VNJSWPnmSxxDpiQ=
=T6Vl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
