Hi, [...] > Figured this out and started comparing the list in SSCI and FSCI. It has the > same number of elements, and all the items in the list in FSCI are valid > objects. The last item in FSCI's list is the first item in SSCI's list, > though. Weird.
Interesting. This might be an incompatibility in the way we construct/handle lists... Lars: Does SSCI change the order of elements of lists in kernel space, in some cases. > There is a difference in the shaft object in the list between FSCI and SSCI. > In FSCI, the underbits are 0 and in SSCI, they are $ea64. The statue, > fountain, water1, water2, and other objects in the list all have similar > problems. I don't know if this makes any difference in FSCI, but thought I > would mention it. We don't use underbits, but I'm not certain if we should reveal this to the scripts... llap, Christoph
