visually is the only way. Do you think it is white matter?
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

Yes it's my doubt too, but how can I check this?


2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
      then it's not rerunning the -cp. And is it really wm if it's
      that dark?
      On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

      Bruce,no the intensity is lesser then 110 at those voxels,
      it's like 60-70.
      Claudia


      2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
            is the intensity at those voxels 110 after you have
      processed
            with autorecon2-cp?
            On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

                  The problem is that after editng manually WM
      by
                  adding control points, I
                  still have some WM and GM areas not included
      in
                  either the pial or WM
                  boundaries, but I can see that there are
      control
                  points added (green
                  cosses), but they seem  not to be processed by
      the
                  autorecon2-cp autorecon3.
                  Thanks
                  Claudia



                  2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl
      <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
                        Hi Claudia

                        can you describe the problems? And cc
      the list
                  so that others
                        can help?
                        thanks
                        Bruce

                        On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino
      wrote:

                        Hi Bruce,I think wm.mgz it's accurate
      enough,
                  but what you
                        mean?
                        I'm trying to upload data, but I've
      problems
                  with your
                        server.
                        Cheers,
                        Claudia


                        2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl
                  <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
                              Hi Claudia

                              it really depends on the
      individual case
                  and what's
                        causing the
                              exclusion. Does the wm.mgz look
                  accurate? If so, you
                        may have a
                              topological defect that is being
      fixed
                  incorrectly.
                        Usually we
                              focus on fixing the white boundary
      and
                  that will
                        also correct
                              the pial. You can set the expected
      gray
                  matter
                        intensities in
                              the xopts file, but that is rarely
                  necessary and
                        only if your
                              gray matter looks very different
      than
                  the sequences
                        we are used
                              to.

                              If you can't sort it out feel free
      to
                  upload you
                        data.

                              cheers
                              Bruce


                              On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia
      Dacquino
                  wrote:

                                    Hi Freesurfers,I have a
      question
                  about pial
                        editing.
                                    I have some reconructions in
      which
                  there's a
                        lot of
                                    grey matter excluded,
                                    and consequently white
      metter too.
                  I did
                        correct
                                    these images manually by
                                    control points editing, and
      then
                  autorecon2-cp
                                    autorecon3, but some
      cortical
                                    grey matter continues to not
      be
                  included in
                        the pial
                                    surface, and I have
                                    white matter areas that are
      still
                  not included
                        in
                                    either the pial or white
                                    matter boundaries. 
                                    Is there anyother ethods for
                  adding grey
                        matter in
                                    the pial surfeces other
                                    than editing control points
      (such
                  as by
                        editing
                                    voxels to add grey matter),
                                    or something like that?
                                    Thanks for your help.
                                    Claudia




                        The information in this e-mail is
      intended
                  only for the
                        person to whom
                        it is
                        addressed. If you believe this e-mail
      was sent
                  to you in
                        error and the
                        e-mail
                        contains patient information, please
      contact
                  the Partners
                        Compliance
                        HelpLine at
                        http://www.partners.org/complianceline .
      If
                  the e-mail was
                        sent to you
                        in error
                        but does not contain patient
      information,
                  please contact
                        the sender
                        and properly
                        dispose of the e-mail.









_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to