Hi Andrew

the brain.mgz is very aggressively filtered explicitly for cortex and wipes away some subcortical boundaries (e.g. lateral thalamus).

cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Andrew Davis wrote:

Hello FreeSurfer Developers,

I have been using FreeSurfer for segmenting T1-weighted images, and I have a 
question related to using the two outputs norm.mgz and brain.mgz.

It is my understanding that, by default, FreeSurfer uses the norm.mgz volume to 
do partial volume weighting when outputting segmentation volumes to aseg.stats 
based on aseg.mgz [^1]. Further, I understand that
brain.mgz is output from a second normalization step in the recon-all processing 
stream, having taken norm.mgz as an input [^2].  The wiki says "Intensity 
normalization works better when the skull has been removed.
Creates a new brain.mgz volume".

My question is: if brain.mgz is meant to be an improved version of norm.mgz, 
why not use brain.mgz for partial volume weighting?  What advantages does 
norm.mgz provide?

Thanks much,
Andrew Davis

[^1]: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReconAllDevTable
[^2]: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/recon-all


​​​
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to