Hi Nils

no, in general we don't recommend this. It adds unneeded variance (and 
maybe bias).

cheers
Bruce


On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Nils Opel wrote:

> Hi Freesurfer Developers,
>
> i am currently collecting structural imaging data from several large cohorts 
> that have been processed using different freesurfer versions (5.3 and 6.0).
>
> I would be interested on your experiences regarding compatibility between 
> both versions for subcortical and cortical segmentations.
>
> More specifically: would it be appropriate to include subcortical and 
> cortical measures derived from both freesurfer versions (5.3 and 6.0) in the 
> same analysis?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance and best regards,
> Nils
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to