Hi Nils no, in general we don't recommend this. It adds unneeded variance (and maybe bias).
cheers Bruce On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Nils Opel wrote: > Hi Freesurfer Developers, > > i am currently collecting structural imaging data from several large cohorts > that have been processed using different freesurfer versions (5.3 and 6.0). > > I would be interested on your experiences regarding compatibility between > both versions for subcortical and cortical segmentations. > > More specifically: would it be appropriate to include subcortical and > cortical measures derived from both freesurfer versions (5.3 and 6.0) in the > same analysis? > > Thanks a lot in advance and best regards, > Nils > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.