External Email - Use Caution
Dear Dr Bruce,
Thank you for the response. Indeed, I was completely wrong, these represent a
pathology and should not correct for!
Kindly, I have one additional question not relevant to the subject of this
email. Is there any way in Freesurfer to create mask for the regions between
the sulcuses. I want to compute PET signal in these regions and normalize for
Thank you so much!
why do you want to correct for them? They likely represent a pathological
process, so correcting for them may remove whatever effects you are looking
for, no? The space between the sulci and the ventricle volume won't directly
affect surface-based analysis, but of course the sulcal widening likely
reflects cortical atrophy that will be
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On July 11, 2018 11:37 AM, John Anderson <john.ande...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
> I have two groups of subjects (healthy and patients). The patients have
> different degrees of atrophy. Looking into the individual scans, the subjects
> are largely different in the space between the sulcuses and the size of
> ventricles. My questions are:
> 1. Is there any way to correct for these differences in the surface based
> 2. Including eTIV covariate does it help in this case?
> 3. Does the resampling to "fsaverage" overcome the challenge of these
> differences between the subjects?
> I appreciate any advice,
Freesurfer mailing list
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.