Hi yujunjie
you need to look at the *.nofix surfaces and see where the defect is.
Skull and neck being left is around isn't a problem unless they are
included in the surfaces.
cheers
Bruce
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, 1013364183 wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Bruce Fischl,
Thank you very much for your reply. I checked the effect of going down the
skull and found that a
large part of the skull has not been removed. The appendix contains images of
skull removal. I want
to know how we should handle it.
yours yujunjie
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Bruce Fischl"<fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>;
Date: Sun, Nov 18, 2018 00:10 AM
To: "Freesurfer support list"<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>;
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Modify defect failed
Hi yujunjie
the last entry in the log file is:
CORRECTING DEFECT 5 (vertices=53772, convex hull=1434, v0=15308)
XL defect detected...
this is a giant defect - about 1/4 of your total surface. It means that
something major went wrong - skull attached, or hemis connected or
something. You should look at the rh.orig.nofix and the
rh.inflated.nofix surfaces to see what it is.
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 17
Nov 2018, 1013364183 wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear FS,
> I ran the recon-all command and it failed to fix it for many days when I
fixed the defect. I have
> modified the threshold of the split algorithm. I want to know if there are
other ways to fix the
Its
> log file is in the attachment.
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> yours yujunjie
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
