ok, let us know if we can help further
Bruce
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo wrote:


        External Email - Use Caution        

Thanks for your help :)Going on with the use Free Surfer!!

Regards,
Rosalia

El dom., 18 nov. 2018 17:11, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> escribió:
      overlay the white and pial surfaces and see if the skull is included 
inside
      the pial

      On Sun, 18 Nov
      2018, Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo wrote:

      >
      >         External Email - Use Caution        
      >
      > Hi  Bruce,
      > Thank you a lot for your reply. How could I inspect if affects the 
surfaces?
      >
      > Yours sincerely,
      > Rosalia
      >
      >
      > El dom., 18 nov. 2018 16:58, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
escribió:
      >       that should work ok. It only matter if it affects the surfaces 
though (or
      >       the aseg)
      >       cheers
      >       Bruce
      >
      >       On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo wrote:
      >
      >       >
      >       >         External Email - Use Caution        
      >       >
      >       > Hi Bruce,
      >       > Sorry for my intromission. 
      >       > I am replacing the brainmask because dura mater or skull were 
left behind with
      >       independence of the
      >       > WM and GM segmemtation. Does this is useless?
      >       >
      >       > Regards,
      >       > Rosalia 
      >       >
      >       > El dom., 18 nov. 2018 16:16, Bruce Fischl 
<fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
      escribió:
      >       >       Hi yujunjie
      >       >
      >       >       you need to look at the *.nofix surfaces and see where 
the defect is.
      >       >       Skull and neck being left is around isn't a problem 
unless they are
      >       >       included in the surfaces.
      >       >
      >       >       cheers
      >       >       Bruce
      >       >       On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, 1013364183 wrote:
      >       >
      >       >       >
      >       >       >         External Email - Use Caution        
      >       >       >
      >       >       > Dear Bruce Fischl,
      >       >       >   Thank you very much for your reply. I checked the 
effect of going
      down the
      >       skull and
      >       >       found that a
      >       >       > large part of the skull has not been removed. The 
appendix contains
      images of
      >       skull
      >       >       removal. I want
      >       >       > to know how we should handle it.
      >       >       >
      >       >       > yours yujunjie
      >       >       > ------------------ Original ------------------
      >       >       > From:  "Bruce Fischl"<fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>;
      >       >       > Date:  Sun, Nov 18, 2018 00:10 AM
      >       >       > To:  "Freesurfer support 
list"<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>;
      >       >       > Subject:  Re: [Freesurfer] Modify defect failed
      >       >       >
      >       >       > Hi yujunjie
      >       >       >
      >       >       > the last entry in the log file is:
      >       >       >
      >       >       > CORRECTING DEFECT 5 (vertices=53772, convex hull=1434, 
v0=15308)
      >       >       > XL defect detected...
      >       >       >
      >       >       >
      >       >       > this is a giant defect - about 1/4 of your total 
surface. It means
      that
      >       >       > something major went wrong - skull attached, or hemis 
connected or
      >       >       > something. You should look at the rh.orig.nofix and the
      >       >       > rh.inflated.nofix surfaces to see what it is.
      >       >       >
      >       >       > cheers
      >       >       > Bruce
      >       >       >
      >       >       >
      >       >       > On Sat, 17
      >       >       > Nov 2018, 1013364183 wrote:
      >       >       >
      >       >       > >
      >       >       > >  External Email - Use Caution
      >       >       > >
      >       >       > > Dear FS,
      >       >       > >  I ran the recon-all command and it failed to fix it 
for many days
      when I
      >       fixed the
      >       >       defect. I have
      >       >       > > modified the threshold of the split algorithm. I want 
to know if
      there are
      >       other
      >       >       ways to fix the
      >       >       > Its
      >       >       > > log file is in the attachment.
      >       >       > >
      >       >       > > Thank you in advance
      >       >       > >
      >       >       > > yours yujunjie
      >       >       > >
      >       >       > >
      >       >       > _______________________________________________
      >       >       > Freesurfer mailing list
      >       >       > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      >       >       > 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >       >       >
      >       >       >_______________________________________________
      >       >       Freesurfer mailing list
      >       >       Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      >       >       
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >       >
      >       >
      >       >_______________________________________________
      >       Freesurfer mailing list
      >       Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      >       https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >
      >
      >_______________________________________________
      Freesurfer mailing list
      Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to