Hi Omar, we have played around with CAT12 a little bit and are finding systematic differences (eg, CAT thickness is thicker than FS). In the one study we tried, the group analysis was quite different. We have not had time to really dig into it yet. best doug
On 9/20/19 3:14 PM, Maximo, Jose Omar wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi, > > Recently, I ran an analysis on Freesurfer and found increased cortical > thickness on the patients compared to controls. > > Then, I heard about CAT12 and wanted to see if my results would be > robust enough and be replicated using this other software. When I ran > the analysis on CAT12, the results look completely different (both > increased and decreases). I was not able to see the same clusters on > the CAT12 results. I used the same subjects and covariates. > > I ran recon-all using both T1 and T2 images, whereas in CAT12 you can > only use T1 images. > > Has anyone experimented with both software before? > > Best, > > Omar > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
