If you have an anatomical MR that you have run through recon-all, then 
just use that one instead of bert in your steps below
ps. Please remember to post to the FS list and not to us personally

On 11/12/19 8:41 PM, an wrote:
>
>         External Email - Use Caution
>
> Many thanks.
>
> I got the 4D fMRI dataset from others and it is not raw data. In order 
> to run mri_vol2surf, I need to calculate the register.dat for the 
> required flag --srcreg so I tried in this way.
>
> FYI, the 4D fMRI dataset should have been registered with its 
> anatomical MR volume by using other tools.
>
> For now I only ran the recon-all on its anatomical MR volume without 
> running the functional stream as I don't have the raw data.
>
> Should I also run the raw fMRI data from scratch by using functional 
> stream? Or if I can run mri_vol2surf independently, which command 
> should I use to get a register.dat file?
> In addition, the intensity of the 4D fMRI dataset I have is between 
> [-1, 1] and not integers, would this cause any problem?
>
> Best,
> An
>
>
> On 11/12/19 10:41 AM, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. wrote:
>> Don't do the 1st step.
>> Why are you registering it to bert? I'm pretty sure bert did not 
>> participate in your fmri study
>> When you run mri_vol2surf, it will probably work better with 
>> --projfrac 0.5
>>
>> On 11/11/2019 1:32 PM, An wrote:
>>>
>>>         External Email - Use Caution
>>>
>>> Hi Prof. Greve,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply and sorry for the confusion.
>>>
>>> I have a 4D fMRI dataset with 10 time frames, where the intensity of 
>>> each voxel is between [-1,1] and not integers. I want to map the 
>>> intensities of the volumes on its corresponding surface in order to 
>>> get the functional values on each vertex in each frame. I have 
>>> already run its corresponding anatomical image in freesurfer.
>>>
>>> To achieve it, I tried the following steps:
>>> 1. conform the fmri series by using mri_convert
>>> 2. register the fmri series with the anatomy image by using 
>>> bbregister: bbregister --mov /4Dvol.nii/ --s bert --reg register.dat
>>> 3. assign values from volumes to each vertex by using mri_vol2surf: 
>>> mri_vol2surf --src /4Dvol.nii /--out/lhtest.mgz/ --srcreg 
>>> register.dat --hemi lh
>>>     I also tried the -regheader in mri_vol2surf: mri_vol2surf --src 
>>> /4Dvol.nii /--out/lhtest.mgz/ --regheader bert --hemi lh
>>>
>>>
>>> The /4Dvol.nii /aligns very well with the orig.mgz in freeview. But 
>>> after step2, the registered volume looks wrong. I am wondering could 
>>> I use bbregister to register multi-frame fMRI series to a single 
>>> volume?
>>> I also tried to use --regheader to replace the --srcreg file in 
>>> mri_vol2surf as the output register.dat in step2 is wrong. But the 
>>> output is still wrong.
>>>
>>> Many thanks.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> An
>>>
>>> Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu 
>>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> 于2019年11月11日周一 下午12:16写道:
>>>
>>>     When you say it is 4D, what do you mean? That each label has its
>>>     own frame?
>>>
>>>     On 11/6/19 5:59 PM, 曲岸 wrote:
>>>     >
>>>     >         External Email - Use Caution
>>>     >
>>>     > Hi there,
>>>     >
>>>     > I am working with creating a surface parcellation from a
>>>     volumetric
>>>     > parcellation and have some questions as follows:
>>>     >
>>>     > 1. If the volumetric parcellation is a labeled 4D multi-frame
>>>     dataset,
>>>     > could I still use the mris_sample_parc? Or could mri_vol2surf
>>>     get the
>>>     > sampled labels for every vertex?
>>>     >
>>>     > 2. For the 4D multi-frame dataset and mri_vol2surf output
>>>     results,
>>>     > which GUI should I use to visualize it? I tried freeview for 4D
>>>     > multi-frame dataset but it looks weird.
>>>     >
>>>     > 3. Is there any command to separate multi-frame volume to
>>>     single frame
>>>     > volumes?
>>>     >
>>>     > Many thanks!
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > Best,
>>>     > An
>>>     >
>>>     > _______________________________________________
>>>     > Freesurfer mailing list
>>>     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>     > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Freesurfer mailing list
>>>     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to