I still see a compelling business case for a foundation supported free
open source set of libs for the base protocols, commercially supported
by multiple contributors who build higher level applications using the
base protocols. In a situation like this, commercial sponsors can
pool resources for certification. Obviously anyone using a modified
version would not be using certified code but the sponsors who pay for
certification would still get multiple benefits.
Mike
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Ken Rice wrote:
I don’t see a non Commercial one getting certification and then
getting widely used here in the states... That’s the problem you
have to spend tons of time to get them certified... Its not like SIP
where they will pretty much take anything and everything unfortunately
K
From: Brian West <br...@freeswitch.org>
Reply-To: "freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org" <freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:59:18 -0600
To: "freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org" <freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack
We should have an open source one too thats MPL or BSD ... I don't
agree with selling protocols like this commercially. Guess thats
just the Open Source in me wanting that stuff to be free.
/b
On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Ken Rice wrote:
There are things available for this in the commercial space. One
from CometSig.com and one from sangoma. Nothing at this time in
the opensource arena. (OpenSS7 will not be integrated with
freeswitch due to licensing issues)
Contact me off list if you are interested in either of the
commercial versions I can assist you with these things.
Ken
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-dev mailing list
Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org
