This is very helpful, thanks! -MC On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Remko Kloosterman <r.klooster...@mtel.nl> wrote: > Well, I cannot disclose the commercial stuff, but I can share some > experience and resources that I've found to be useful. For example: > > Getting started: http://pt.com/page/tutorials/ss7-tutorial/ > ITU recommendations: http://eu.sabotage.org/, dig in to www/ITU. > I guess you know www.openss7.org > Online (but recently restricted) MTP3 decoder: > http://www.linkbit.com/decoder/decoder.html > Perhaps some design inspiration: > http://www.nmscommunications.com/DevPlatforms/Support/SWandDoc/default.h > tm?section=4&ID=43&PAC=472&ST=Current&dok= > > Want more? > Remko > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] Namens Michael > Collins > Verzonden: woensdag 28 januari 2009 22:23 > Aan: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack > > How about some SS7 documentation? ;) > -MC > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Remko Kloosterman > <r.klooster...@mtel.nl> wrote: >> I've done some SS7 development in the past, using dedicated TX3220 and > >> TX4000 signalling boards from NMS Communications (recentlty aquired by > >> Dialogic). Even with a lot of commercial documentation available, it's > >> horribly complex stuff, especially redundancy. And you need another >> SS7 switch to test against for interoperability. And SIP trunks are >> becoming more and more commonly available these days, so one can >> question if it's worth the effort. Still, I would really like it if >> someone would try and develop such a feature. >> >> Off-topic: If you need SS7 and are willing to pay for it, I can >> recommend audiocodes mediant gateways. There's a model available with >> embedded SS7 signalling, provided by Teles. And real cheap too, >> compared to other SS7 switches. >> >> ________________________________ >> Van: freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org >> [mailto:freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] Namens Shane >> Burrell >> Verzonden: woensdag 28 januari 2009 20:50 >> Aan: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack >> >> Trust me AT&T doesn't have free docs. There are hundreds of ANSI SS7 >> docs and they put alot of work and money to make sure you can't get > them via >> google search. Much of it is not in ITU but many ITU switch support > ANSI >> features such as Class 5. Even with the ITU docs in hand you'll need >> a large team to get it complete enough for Class 4/5 operations > anytime soon. >> On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Jan Berger wrote: >> >> Next time try to search if AT&T have a free version of the doc first - > >> you might get a suprice. >> >> ________________________________ >> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:36:02 -0600 >> From: kr...@freeswitch.org >> To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack >> >> Must be nice ;) >> >> Here in the states they want you to pay for documentation on cable >> pinouts and don't even think about getting documentation for something > >> like TCAP LIDB without giving up your first born and an arm. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Jan Berger <ja...@live.com> >> Reply-To: "freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org" >> <freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> >> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:22:38 +0100 >> To: <freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack >> >> I live in Europe - and ITU/ETSI are free :) >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:37:48 -0600 >> From: kr...@freeswitch.org >> To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack >> >> That's the same thing we saw... Everyone wants SS7 but no one wants >> to help fund it... And to make matters worse just getting proper >> documentation for ANSI SS7 is not exactly a cheap endeavor. >> Unfortunately telecordia and crew still want to charge thousands of >> dollars for the docs when the ITU decided ages ago to make those >> available for free... Even then its still a substantial amount of >> effort to get something working (even if you have active links you can > >> use to help understand whats going on) >> >> K >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: Jan Berger <ja...@live.com> >> Reply-To: "freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org" >> <freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> >> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:30:15 +0100 >> To: <freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack >> >> This is a little like the hen and the egg... >> >> No one will support you starting to write a SS7 ++ stack, but once you > >> get going and the first stacks turns up, so will business. >> >> Jan >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> >> From: m...@jerris.com >> To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org >> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:06:11 -0500 >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack >> >> >> I still see a compelling business case for a foundation supported free > >> open source set of libs for the base protocols, commercially supported > >> by multiple contributors who build higher level applications using the > >> base protocols. In a situation like this, commercial sponsors can >> pool resources for certification. Obviously anyone using a modified >> version would not be using certified code but the sponsors who pay for > >> certification would still get multiple benefits. >> >> Mike >> >> On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Ken Rice wrote: >> >> >> >> I don't see a non Commercial one getting certification and then >> getting widely used here in the states... That's the problem you have >> to spend tons of time to get them certified... Its not like SIP where >> they will pretty much take anything and everything unfortunately >> >> K >> >> From: Brian West <br...@freeswitch.org> >> Reply-To: "freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org" >> <freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> >> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:59:18 -0600 >> To: "freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org" >> <freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH SS7 stack >> >> We should have an open source one too thats MPL or BSD ... I don't >> agree with selling protocols like this commercially. Guess thats just > >> the Open Source in me wanting that stuff to be free. >> >> /b >> >> On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Ken Rice wrote: >> >> There are things available for this in the commercial space. One from > >> CometSig.com and one from sangoma. Nothing at this time in the >> opensource arena. (OpenSS7 will not be integrated with freeswitch due >> to licensing >> issues) >> >> Contact me off list if you are interested in either of the commercial >> versions I can assist you with these things. >> >> Ken >> >> >> ________________________________ >> check out the rest of the Windows Live(tm). More than mail-Windows > Live(tm) >> goes way beyond your inbox. More than messages >> <http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/> >> ________________________________ >> _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-dev mailing list >> Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >> http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org/> >> >> ________________________________ >> check out the rest of the Windows Live(tm). More than mail-Windows > Live(tm) >> goes way beyond your inbox. More than messages >> <http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/> >> ________________________________ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-dev mailing list >> Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> ________________________________ >> Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. >> Check it out! _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-dev mailing list >> Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-dev mailing list >> Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-dev mailing list > Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-dev mailing list > Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev > http://www.freeswitch.org >
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-dev mailing list Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
