There is probably about 80% doxygen coverage on the switch_ namespace
right now. Of course filling in those holes is much appretiated, but
I have a feeling there might be some other piece in understanding that
we are missing. Can you explain a bit more what information if you
had would have helped? Also, feel free to pop by irc and we can give
some real time feedback on api.
Mike
On Sep 18, 2009, at 3:18 AM, Muhammad Shahzad wrote:
Hi,
I have observed that one of the major hurdle while writing patches
and / or bug fixes is lack of doxygen documentation for FS source
code. For example it took me 5+ days to understand mod_dingaling
code and its hooks into FS source code to write up soft reload
patch, while it could have taken less then 3 days to do so if source
code documentation was available.
So, since right now i have some human resources including myself
available, I would like to document all source code (or at least
core FS code i.e. everything that has "switch_" prefix) using
doxygen. I know its a huge task and will take a while to complete
but at least lets get it started.
If anyone else wants to participate as well in this task, then we
can team up to complete it quickly.
Let me know if you guys are interested.
Thank you.
--
Muhammad Shahzad
-----------------------------------
CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
Cell: +92 334 422 40 88
MSN: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org
