On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 11:31 -0700, Peter Volchek wrote: > The second one, checks for the "0" value in the denominator; the first > one doesn't, so the potential segfault exists.
That wouldnt be a segfault, but it would be a critical error. Mosts systems map that to an FPE :) good catch, did you see if anything that calls it does a check before hand? It may be that its only called by things that check, I know at one point in the code some tests were done many times, it appeared to me that there was not a defined policy of when things should do the checking so it ended up duplicating the error checks which results in slightly slower code. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel pgp key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8AE5C721 _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
