I believe so. I have logged a ticket with Gizmo5. I hope they could resolve this issue soon.
On Sat Jan 23 11:18:39 PST 2010, Michael Jerris wrote: > That means they answered the call already. Is that accurate? On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Paul Li <plite2...@gmail.com> wrote: > By comparing the log from a working service provider (Working) to that > from Gizmo5, I have found out the problem might be Gizmo5 (service > provider). While FreeSWITCH was performing TRANSFER, > > Gizmo5: Channel sofia/softphone/001x...x entering state [completing][200] > Working: Channel sofia/softphone/001x...x entering state [proceeding][180] > > Gizmo5: Channel sofia/softphone/001x...x entering state [ready][200] > Working: Channel sofia/softphone/001x...x entering state [proceeding][180] > > Gizmo5: [Channel sofia/softphone/001x...x] has been answered > Working: Pre-Answer sofia/softphone/001x...x > > Both began "Running State Change CS_ROUTING". After routing was > successful, the working service provider finally enter [200] state. > > Working: Channel sofia/softphone/001x...x entering state [completing][200] > Working: Channel sofia/softphone/001x...x entering state [ready][200] > > At this point, the working service provider finally connects > sofia/softphone/001x...x to the playback channel. I am wondering what > response Gizmo5 sent to FreeSWITCH and led FreeSWITCH to think the > call prematurally entered state [completing][200] and [ready][200]. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
