I believe it has to do with how the language is constructed. Lua is built to be very lightweight.
Last time I checked, spidermonkey had some problems with delays on some very specific cases due to its inner workings, but I can't tell for sure. Will you share your ccxml/vxml integration? I believe that these 2 components are something that lots of ppl could use. JM On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jan Berger <jan.ber...@video24.no> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I know from a previous postings/discussions that the Javascript we use is > considered to be bad – performance and memory wise. Can someone explain a > little – who did the Javascript integration? > > > > The reason I ask is because I am working on ccxml and vxml – and I need to > add ECMAScript due to compatibility with external tools/libraries > > . > > The impression I get from wiki is that Lua perform 2 x the speed of > JavaScript – does anyone know exactly why? > > > > Jan > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list > FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev > http://www.freeswitch.org > >
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
