Does this really fix it ? I wonder because the problem I see here is also that the FXS side detects the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO side for generation. That leads to the called party receiving twice the DTMF, the first one is the inband DTMF, the second is the one queued/generated by the FXO channel.
For a clean fix, I guess some kind of application should be created, that would prevent DTMF to be queued on the other channel. Such application would then be called before the bridge. Maybe there is a cleaner way to do this. François On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:23:13 -0500, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jero...@thegreek.com> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I have a problem that is very similar to a problem > reported by François [1] except for the fact that > my FXS and FXO ports are on a Xorcom Astribank > device instead of a Sangoma. > > To quote François: "The problem is that each leg of > the bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so > [F]reeswitch sends each detected DTMF from one leg > to the other, and so on and so forth (as each leg > detects the DTMF again and again)" > > HIS words but evidenced by the MY log :) > > The snippet below has DTMF coming in on the FXS port > (1:1) and bouncing between it and the FXO port (3:1). > The ports are simply bridged together with > > "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/F)" or "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/w)" > > I'm running: > > FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-01c0c69 2010-06-08 16-22-21 -0500) > dahdi: Version: SVN-trunk-r8762 > > Output of lsdahdi at end of message. > > ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<---- > [...] > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.217256 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4] > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.256255 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4] > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.397253 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4] > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame! (write > not ready) > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 1:1 GENERATE DTMF [4] > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.637249 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4] > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.676248 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4] > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.859244 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame! (write > not ready) > [...ad infinitum...] > ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<---- > > Because I needed DTMF pass-through working "now" > I applied an ugly HACK. This drops DTMF tones > detected on spans 3 and 4 (which are my FXO > spans). This is very WRONG but it does solve > my immediate problem: > > ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<---- > diff --git a/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c > b/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c > index 5aebfea..ff3b081 100644 > --- a/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c > +++ b/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c > @@ -718,8 +718,12 @@ static switch_status_t > channel_read_frame(switch_core_session_t *session, switch > for (p = dtmf; p && *p; p++) { > if (is_dtmf(*p)) { > _dtmf.digit = *p; > - zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "queue DTMF [%c]\n", > *p); > - switch_channel_queue_dtmf(channel, &_dtmf); > + if (tech_pvt->zchan->span_id == 3 || > tech_pvt->zchan->span_id == 4) { > + zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "Ignoring > DTMF [%c] on FXO port %d:%d\n", *p, tech_pvt->zchan->span_id, > tech_pvt->zchan->chan_id) > ; > + } else { > + zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "queue DTMF > [%c]\n", *p); > + switch_channel_queue_dtmf(channel, > &_dtmf); > + } > } > } > } > ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<---- > > Can someone point me in the "right" direction > instead? Do I need to do this at the OpenZAP/DAHDI > level by disabling some kind of DTMF detection > like was done for the Sangoma driver? > > Any and all pointers appreciated. > > Cheers, > -Slim > > [1] [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF > http://www.mail-archive.com/freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org/msg02830.htm > l > > [Freeswitch-dev] Problem with sending > DTMF on FXS port bridged to an FXO port > http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2010-April/003607.html > > > ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<---- > [r...@localhost freeswitch]# lsdahdi > ### Span 1: XBUS-00/XPD-00 "Xorcom XPD #00/00: FXS" (MASTER) > 1 FXS FXOKS > 2 FXS FXOKS > 3 FXS FXOKS > 4 FXS FXOKS > 5 FXS FXOKS > 6 FXS FXOKS > 7 FXS FXOKS > 8 FXS FXOKS > 9 Output FXOKS > 10 Output FXOKS > 11 Input FXOKS > 12 Input FXOKS > 13 Input FXOKS > 14 Input FXOKS > ### Span 2: XBUS-00/XPD-10 "Xorcom XPD #00/10: FXS" > 15 FXS FXOKS > 16 FXS FXOKS > 17 FXS FXOKS > 18 FXS FXOKS > 19 FXS FXOKS > 20 FXS FXOKS > 21 FXS FXOKS > 22 FXS FXOKS > ### Span 3: XBUS-00/XPD-20 "Xorcom XPD #00/20: FXO" > 23 FXO FXSKS RED > 24 FXO FXSKS RED > 25 FXO FXSKS RED > 26 FXO FXSKS RED > 27 FXO FXSKS RED > 28 FXO FXSKS RED > 29 FXO FXSKS RED > 30 FXO FXSKS RED > ### Span 4: XBUS-00/XPD-30 "Xorcom XPD #00/30: FXO" > 31 FXO FXSKS RED > 32 FXO FXSKS RED > 33 FXO FXSKS RED > 34 FXO FXSKS RED > 35 FXO FXSKS RED > 36 FXO FXSKS RED > 37 FXO FXSKS RED > 38 FXO FXSKS RED > ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<---- > > > Cheers, > -Slim > -- > Jeroen C. "Slim" van Gelderen > Olympic Sports Data Services > Email: jero...@thegreek.com > Phone: +1 876 953 6182 x128 > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list > FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev > http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org