A lot of stuff is statically initialized, the core isn't designed to be loaded/unloaded like that. Why exactly do you require calling switch_core_init_and_modload() after the initial startup?
Mathieu Rene Avant-Garde Solutions Inc Office: + 1 (514) 664-1044 x100 Cell: +1 (514) 664-1044 x200 mr...@avgs.ca On 2010-06-30, at 12:44 PM, Paulo Vicentini wrote: > Hi, > I am embedding libfreeswitch to my application's process space and I need to > "init" and "destroy" freeswitch while running my process. > I face problems after calling switch_core_destroy and when my business logic > demands I call switch_core_init_and_modload to work with libfreeswitch > (again) > It seems that struct switch_runtime runtime is not cleared aproprietaly when > destroying the core. > I made some tests clearing runtime struct but still getting segfaults on > apr_queue_trypush (trying to find out the issue) > Can you please help me out with this issue? > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list > FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev > http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
