Jonathan Palley napsal(a): > I get the feeling that some of these edge optimizations are, > rightfully, not the top priority for the core team.
I think so. And this why I think about to do it myself :-) If someone other see it useful... > If you make > these changes I'm happy to help test as all of our users are behind a > NAT. If I have success in doing such changes to sources, I'm very glad if you help me with testing. Thanks Jonathan! > Right now we don't have enough users to justify doing this > optimization ourselves though. > And I have nearly no experiences with FreeSWITCH :-) > As for keeping the UDP connection open I recommend having the client > send "blank" UDP packets and setting the interval there. > Yes, I agree. But few of them (for example Nokia mobile phones) can't do that. And this why should I send keep-alive packets (dummy packets or valid OPTIONS), but only to few of NATed UACs. Thus I have to have an option to distinguish between UACs which need to be nat-pinged and which not :-) Best regards, kokoska.rokoska _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
