The double nat scenario is going to be a fun one to solve. You're
better off putting FreeSWITCH on a public IP or fully understanding
what is going on.
The outbound profile isn't for inbound registrations by default. Its
almost what you need but you'll need to turn auth-calls=true and you
might need to force the registration domain. Do you have phones
behind that nat with FreeSWITCH registering to port 5060?
<param name="force-register-domain" value="cluecon.com"/> <-- force
the domain on a sip profile.
/b
On Apr 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Chris Chen wrote:
Could any of you share your experience with remote SIP extensions
behind another NAT?
Basically my setup whould be like this:
[ Remote SIP extensions]------>(private IP@) NAT Router B---(public
IP @B)-------(Internet Cloud)-----------(public IP @A) NAT Router
A---(private IP @A)------(private [EMAIL PROTECTED])[Freeswitch]
I have the domain registered as "sip.mydomain.com"
let's see, I am trying to config the remote SIP extension as 1018
using port 5080 hitting the public context, but I got the error on
the freeswitch console
"user [EMAIL PROTECTED] not found"
Could you guys guide me to the right direction for remote SIP
extensions' deploymen?
Your helps are appreciate.
Thanks,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
