Yea, seems like a pretty old machine. and I thought it was at least a dual core thou :( I couldn't find a way turn hyperthreading off during boot time yet, If I do, will report back if it does some improvment.
btw, How do you know if this is hyperthread processor from cpuinfo? Rgds, Johny K. On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These aren't really dual core CPU's they are single core with > hyper-threading. If you disable hyper-threading you'll get more > performance. > You'll never get that great of performance out of these CPU's. The new > 64bit woodcrest/clovertown Xeon's are much better... night and day > difference. (Pinto vs Porsche) > > /b > > On May 29, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Johny Kadarisman wrote: > > Hi Brian, attached is my cpu info. > > Rgds, > > ================ > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 15 > model : 2 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > stepping : 9 > cpu MHz : 2784.780 > cache size : 512 KB > physical id : 0 > siblings : 2 > core id : 0 > cpu cores : 1 > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : no > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 2 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxs > r sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr > bogomips : 5573.58 > clflush size : 64 > > > processor : 1 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 15 > model : 2 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > stepping : 9 > cpu MHz : 2784.780 > cache size : 512 KB > physical id : 0 > siblings : 2 > core id : 0 > cpu cores : 1 > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : no > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 2 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxs > r sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr > bogomips : 5569.09 > clflush size : 64 > > > processor : 2 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 15 > model : 2 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > stepping : 9 > cpu MHz : 2784.780 > cache size : 512 KB > physical id : 3 > siblings : 2 > core id : 0 > cpu cores : 1 > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : no > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 2 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxs > r sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr > bogomips : 5569.31 > clflush size : 64 > > > processor : 3 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 15 > model : 2 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > stepping : 9 > cpu MHz : 2784.780 > cache size : 512 KB > physical id : 3 > siblings : 2 > core id : 0 > cpu cores : 1 > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : no > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 2 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxs > r sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr > bogomips : 5569.67 > clflush size : 64 > > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Can you cat /proc/cpuinfo and post that? >> /b >> >> On May 29, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Johny Kadarisman wrote: >> >> Thanks Anthony, >> >> It's a 32bits Ubuntu server version, and I had blindly follow and run the >> test with following settings :) >> >> ulimit -c unlimited >> ulimit -d unlimited >> ulimit -f unlimited >> ulimit -i unlimited >> ulimit -n 999999 >> ulimit -q unlimited >> ulimit -u unlimited >> ulimit -v unlimited >> ulimit -x unlimited >> ulimit -s 244 >> ulimit -l unlimited >> ulimit -a >> bin/freeswitch >> >> also, I set with 120ms interval, I still hit around 170 channels limits in >> one room. >> Let me play around more with multiple room setup. >> >> Rgds, >> Johny K. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Anthony Minessale < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> We don't do much testing on the conference but i can give you a few >>> pointers. >>> >>> is it a 32 or 64 bit box? >>> if it's 32 you can try this as root before you start up. >>> >>> ulimit -s 244 >>> >>> you can also change the conference interval to higher number of ms >>> between packets to give it more time to mux the audio, the default is 20 but >>> you should be able to use 30,40,60,120 as well >>> >>> You can also try multiple conference to compare. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Johny Kadarisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I build a new test boxes for freeswitch. and trying to simulate high >>>> load condition. >>>> I have one freeswitch box that host conference apps, and another box >>>> with simple js to originate call to the conference room. >>>> To monitor the sound quality, I have one phones that dial into the >>>> conference room, and then start streaming/playing moh music in the >>>> conference. >>>> >>>> In many scenario that i tried (mute, unmute, one or multiple rooms), the >>>> max total number of channels is about 170 channels before FS start to >>>> slowing down on creating new channels. The Cpu's only tops around 40-50%, >>>> and the voice/rtp start to jitter or delays on my phone. >>>> >>>> These test boxes is running on 2 processor 2.8GHz Dual Core xeon cpu's >>>> and about 1Gb memory. >>>> I think the number already pretty impressive, at least for me :) >>>> >>>> But is this limit sounds right from others experience? Can I still do >>>> more tuning? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Johny K. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Freeswitch-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: >>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Anthony Minessale II >>> >>> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ >>> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ >>> >>> AIM: anthm >>> MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch >>> >>> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference >>> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 >>> googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> pstn:213-799-1400 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Freeswitch-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >>> http://www.freeswitch.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> Brian West >> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > Brian West > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > >
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
