I think the issue we have is we keep feeding ps_process_raw when you stop talking. We need to not do that I think :P
/b On Jul 14, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Frederick Jabre wrote: > > Very well. Even at 30-40% CPU we'll have problem's scaling. Some > more testing reveals that it's probably somewhere between 40-100% > for 9 out of 10 of interps BUT interestingly enough the footprint in > memory is quite low as compared to lumenvox, hovering around 3-5% > mem usage compared to lumenvox's 25%-30% memory for a single interp. > Ouch..! > > Some weird trade-off..? Memory for CPU usage. I hate those. Space/ > Time tradeoff crap. Brings back memories from comp lab... > > I'll toss some conditional additional cash at him if he can > optimize this further. ;) > > Fred Brian West sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
