There should be no To tag with the initial INVITE. The tag is added by the callee per RFC3261.
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, Jon Bruel wrote: > Mike, in my test setup, no tags are added to the To-header by the > FreeSWITCH. The reason why I want to control it? Well, many phones uses > the tag to relate an existing call to a NOTIFY message (send after the > INVITE has been sent) with the same headers (and the same to-tag) as the > INVITE. I'm not aware of how this functionality is described in the RFC, > though. > > My aim is the check if I can use the FreeSWITCH to replicate a function > known in BroadWorks. In this system, there are a number of plug-ins and > web-interfaces which are used to control the SIP phone: Answer, put on > hold and resume. The plug-in controls the application server through a > XML interface, which in turn sends the NOTIFY to the phone. Thus the > phone can be controlled without connectivity between the PC and the > phone. These three states are controlled by a Notify message sent from > the application server. So it would be useful to find a way of sending a > Notify message to the phone from the FreeSWITCH. Other NOTIFY messages > could be used for other useful things such as resetting the phone. _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
