Oops, I forgot to mention anthm as well - he provided great feedback on irc!
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Luke Graybill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Luke Graybill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My suggested solution is to apply the job-id concept from bgapi to >> messages as well, and to go a step further; borrow the Asterisk idea of >> transmitting an identifier along with each command. Every response and event >> related to that command should then contain the very same identifier in the >> header. >> > > After speaking with bkw and MikeJ on irc, I'd like to further clarify my > suggestion to account for the fact that not all events apply directly to > specific commands, but for the ones which do (such as > CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE, and for non-events, like command/reply) I believe > the suggestion stands :) > > Killarny >
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
