On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Jon Bruel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have made some load test, where an Asterisk server was controlled to > make a high number of calls to a FreeSWITCH, which was registered on > Asterisk. Each had its own server. The calls made to the FreeSWITCH were > answered and echoed. The CPU load on the FreeSWITCH server approached 100 % > at around 100 calls. Similar test with an Asterisk server would show 2-3 > times less CPU load. Looping back to the Asterisk, thus avoiding a possible > CPU-loading application (echo), did not show a significantly different > result. > > The test has been done on a CentOS 4 and a FC8 with similar result. > > Any hints about how to increase the capacity to the level of several times > the level of Asterisk – as reported by others? Are we possibly dealing with > some hardware issues related to the NIC and its drivers. /Jon > yes, we need more information to be able to help you which protocol? SIP, I presume, then paste your profiles and also the dialplan you are using you can pastebin it all configs proc/cpuinfo proc/interrupts free ip addr dmesg freeswitch start up log freeswitch debug log for a SINGLE call etc, etc -- wasim h. baig | principal consultant | convergence pk | +92 300 8508070 | as you scope creep, so shall we reap ...
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
