If I change the realm, I will not be able to make outgoing calls because the realm must be 64.115.128.6 in order to register with Metaswitch for outbound calls.

Are you suggesting I create two gateway entries, one for outbound and one for inbound? Will Freeswitch respond with an authenticated BYE message even if the session was initiated in an authenticated fashion by Metaswitch? It's a little frustrating because Metaswitch is initiating the call to Freeswitch without authentication, yet it expects Freeswitch to reply with an authenticated BYE message in order to end the call. It really should be smart enough to realize that since it initiated the call to a particular Freeswitch instance at A.B.C.D IP address, it should allow unauthenticated BYE messages from that IP address.

On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Anthony Minessale wrote:

Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:54:34 -0500
From: Anthony Minessale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Hangup problem/SIP BYE lacking authentication

make sure realm matches the realm in the challenge packet from the other device.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
      Turn on the TPORT_LOG=1 ./freeswitch and let me see the challenge
      packet.

      /b

On Oct 30, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Wellie Chao wrote:

> Here is what I have:
>
> <include>
>  <gateway name="broadview">
>    <param name="username" value="MY_USERNAME"/>
>    <param name="password" value="MY_PASSWORD"/>
>    <param name="realm" value="64.115.128.6"/>
>    <param name="proxy" value="64.115.128.6"/>
>    <param name="register" value="false"/>
>  </gateway>
> </include>
>
> Whether register is true or false doesn't seem to make a difference
> (except that Freeswitch then comes up with broadview in NOREG
> state). On calls from Metaswitch to Freeswitch, it's the same
> problem, and I get the same message in the Freeswitch logs:
>
> 2008-10-30 17:39:04 [ERR] sofia_reg.c:1089
> sofia_reg_handle_sip_r_challenge() No Matching gateway found
>
> I presume this is the same thing with the 401 Unauthorized packet
> being sent by Metaswitch in response to Freeswitch's BYE message.
> Note that the call itself goes just fine. I pick up, both sides can
> hear each other. Just the hangup gets messed up and for some reason
> Metaswitch expects an authenticated BYE message even though the
> connection was not authenticated in the beginning when Metaswitch
> initiated it. The packet trace shows this and it's very odd.
>
> Is that what you meant when you said set up a gateway in Freeswitch
> that has reg=false and the proper credentials?


_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/

AIM: anthm
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888
googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pstn:213-799-1400

_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Reply via email to