Hi ram,
response follow in text,
Regards,
Tristan
ram a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Tristan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi ram,
Part of the solution I built is a redundant openser in front of a
redundant freeswitch install.
FS acting like an SBC ( ie, all calls comes through, and are
filtered based on xml_curl dialplan rules ).
Asterisk was not the solution for me, as it's not as easy as FS to
scale and manage in my HA environnement.
I'm currently thinking of adding some kind of failover method in
FS, to provide 99.9999% uptime even if one box fails.
The better way I saw atm, was to send to a spare FS instance
everything going on the production box, allowing it to
take over the prod'box in case of failure ( ie taking the ip,
opening rtp ports that were opened, and keeping tracks of SIP
transactions
and their status ).
I believe this sort of features cannot be implemented easily in
asterisk, but in FS it should not be too much difficult. Maybe
adding a new channel state tracking changes on the master it's
spare of... ( why not building also a master/master cluster ? ) ....
If you need more, just ask,
Hi
thats really nice
is this what your build system looks my imagination
Openser-----freeswitch boxs (3 or 4) ----PSTN or VoIP Provider
Quite this kind of setup, a little bit more complicated, as I have a few
media servers, and other things on my voip cloud...
To simplify, I have more something like that ( even it's not quite
accurate ):
External UA's ---> FS --> Oser --> FS --> PSTN.
||
Internal UA's
If yes
I have couple of questions
1. Is the user register with Openser or Freeswitch
Openser for internal users, fs for externals.
Openser is really better if you intend to have a lot of UA's registered.
2. are you using Dispatcher or LCR Module to send calls to Freeswitch
dispatcher and dns.
3. how are you able to manage PBX features
PBX features are managed in fs with prefix added to numbers for features
(for example: interception is int{thenumbertointercept} ).
4. CDR done in Openser or Freeswitch
both to provide redundancy of information.
5. how about pre-paid and NAT handling ?
nat is handled by FS using different profiles, I don't want to deal with
real NAT situations ( although I had with Oser and mediaproxy )
I don't have prepaid applications, we're a call center telco provider,
but you can handle these with Oser Or freeswitch, look at mod_python or
mod_lua :)
If you could share some config files offline should be good
just a set of sofia profiles for freeswitch and a good routing config
for OSER should do the trick, there's nothing complicated, contact me on
irc if you need :)
iam looking the same system to deploy
If you want to discuss this, you can find me on irc ( gled ).
thanks
Ram
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
