Michael Jerris napsal(a): > I added some code to protect against this segfault in svn revision > 10483, but it seems like you are getting an invalid presence packet. > Can you update and test and make sure it doesn't segfault anymore, and > paste a sip trace of the message that causes this issue? > > Mike > >
Thank you very much, Mike, for your fix! It looks like it helps. I do more tests tomorow (I am at CET). Presence message is as follows: PUBLISH sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 PUBLISH From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=72e3e8d1 To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [my:ip:6]:5060;branch=z9hG4bK88cce6e78dff940d328b676e13ae321d Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Type: application/pidf+xml Expires: 300 Event: presence User-Agent: SIP Communicator 1.0-alpha3-nightly.build.1519 Windows XP Content-Length: 423 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" xmlns:rpid="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" entity="sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"><dm:person id="p8285"><rpid:activities/></dm:person><tuple id="t1998"><status><basic>open</basic></status><contact>sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</contact><note>Online</note></tuple></presence> And on pcap dump I see ICMPv6 response unreachable (Port unreachable), but FreeSWITCH works ok and process calls on both IPv4 and even IPv6. Thanks once more! Beste regards, kokoska.rokoska _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
