is it stun timeout ? do you have one of the ip set to stun:foo ?
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Michael Giagnocavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Can you do a console loglevel debug, then send all the output around that > time? > > Apart from that, the quickest way might just to attach a debugger, then > break all when it pauses and see where the threads are :). > > -Michael > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Per Møller > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:32 PM > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Windows is slow? > > I checked out the trunk version, and it's still slow. However I found one > improvement - it does not crash on shutdown anymore. > > Could anymore give me some pointers on how to try to debug this on the > Windows platform? > > > // Per > > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Carlos > Talbot > Sendt: 2. december 2008 17:13 > Til: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > Emne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Windows is slow? > > Have you tried the latest msi build? It's based off svn 10564. > > Carlos > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Per Møller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have installed FS 1.0.0 on a Mac using the precompiled .dmg and FS 1.0.1 > on a Windows Vista machine using the precompiled .msi - actually the same > machine). > > Using the default configuration files, and using 2 Snom 360 phones I dialed > from extension 1000 to extension 1001. On the Mac, 1001 starts ringing > instantly, but under Windows it takes 1-2 seconds before it starts ringing. > > It seems to be in the dialplan the time is spent. From the time I see this > line on the console: > > [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:233 dialplan_hunt() Processing 1000->1000 in > context default > > Until the next thing happens it always takes at least 1 full second, but on > the Mac it happens instantly. > > Why is the Windows build this much slower? Is it a known problem? > > I get the feeling that the majority of the FS community is Unix based, > which > is fine by me, but I would really like to know just how well supported and > stable the Win32 build is and if this is currently a viable way to go, or > if > I should stick to Linux/BSD/Mac for production use? > > > // Per > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pstn:213-799-1400
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
