On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 06:42 -0800, Michael S Collins wrote: > Hehe, you just stepped on a land mine! There was A LOT of discussion
ok. I promise that this my last post on this subject :) > about this. The simple fact of the matter is that there was no way to > make everyone happy so the devs chose a layout that might be "ugly" to > some. The key is that XML isn't really "pretty" anyway. The point of > XML is that it needs to be machine readable AND human readable. Since > humans are (usually) smarter than machines it was decided that machine > readable is more important. I like XML actually. IMHO xml with good editor and schema... there is nothing better for config writer. -- greetings, Seweryn _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
