We do not do line-seize. Why impose artificial limitations? You can accomplish pickup and such using nothing but dialplan thats how we do it with Snom.
/b On Jan 9, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > Thanks, I'll play with that and see if I can get enough working to > solve > my current needs. > > I think the bigger issue is that when I see "shared line appearance" > and > "bridged line appearance" in a features list, I think of call > appearances with key-system-like shared extensions with busy lamps and > barge-in-on-pickup, which I gather requires some broadsoft-authored > SIP > extensions (including line-seize events) which don't appear to be > supported. > > Of course, the source code's all there... > > Matthew Kaufman _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
