I actaully just used respond with a 503 and that sends back a "Service unavailable".
If I do: <anti-action application="hangup" data="NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION" /> I get a busy back on the other side, it looks like application="respond" actaully works better in this case. Thanks for the help! On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Anthony Minessale < [email protected]> wrote: > We use the standard rfc q.850 to sip cause code map so you can set > continue_on_fail=true and hangup with the q.850 that maps to 503 (I forgot > what it is atm) > > On Jan 25, 2009 12:09 PM, "Ron McCarthy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it possible to have FS send a 503 / no route found error back? I have > looked and have not seen a place where you can add a custom sip response > code like this. I want to return a 503 if they can't call that destination, > instead of a 404 basically. > > Any help would be great, thanks! > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > >
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
