We are considering asking CentOS to make a "FS cut" set of packages ideal for a telephony server with one install choice.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Nik Middleton < [email protected]> wrote: > Just curious here. > > > > I’ve always followed the fedora route but became disillusioned with the > focus on the desktop rather than the server mode. Of late I’ve moved my > servers to Centos. I felt the need for stable systems. > > > > Everyone seems to slate Centos, but to my surprise Anthony recommends > Centos 5.2 which is nice to hear. Yes I know it’s not bleeding edge, but I > don’t want that. > > > > Any reason why I should not be running Centos with FS? (I do plan on > running 64 bit in future though) > > > > Regards, > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[email protected] <msn%[email protected]> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[email protected]<paypal%[email protected]> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]> iax:[email protected]/888 googletalk:[email protected]<googletalk%3aconf%[email protected]> pstn:213-799-1400
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
