Yes, it can. And as I can see it, freeswitch always gets control over second call, if it finds a free skypiax channel. The problem is that for some skype names it happens as skypiax expects it shoud happen, and for other names it happens the way skypiax doesn't expect and considers it as an exeption. For example, skype names like test-lineX, where X is a digit, work the way skypiax expects, while names like skyland-lineX don't work that way. I have no idea why. Nevertheless, even in this case, skypiax gets control over this call and can possibly manage it the way you would like. It just doesn't know what to do with this kind of skype protocol signaling.
seven-7 wrote: > > ... I haven't play it into deep and not sure if one skype > instance can transfer to another account or another instance on busy. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-a-second-incoming-call-to-the-same-skype-user-name-tp22339162p22398443.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
