Hello everyone, I have an issue where FS seems to get confused in the presence of multiple Record-Route headers. SIP capture here:
http://admin.star2star.com/fs-sip.log I've never seen this with FS before but it appears to process the multiple Record-Route headers backwards, at least in this case. I want to verify: 1) These Record-Route headers are syntactically correct (looks good to me). 2) FS should, in fact, process Record-Route headers "top down" and built its Route: headers (and reply) accordingly. At first I thought the FS/Sofia SIP parser may have been getting confused because the Record-Route from my proxy (.186) does not have a port in the URI. I tried adding a Record-Route header with a port - no difference. This is currently running trunk rev 12218 but I'm about to update to 12571 to see what happens. Thanks! -- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.astlinux.org http://www.star2star.com _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
