http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs

Keith,
Please read the link above... open a jira and collect a sip trace of this also and "attach" it.

/b


On Mar 16, 2009, at 8:36 AM, Keith Laaks wrote:

Hi,

I am on fs 1.0.trunk (12530M) testing G.722 and found that when using a ‘broken’ configuration from a softphone configured for G. 722, I get the warning on the cli:

“We were told to use ptime 20 but what they meant to say was 820
This issue has so far been identified to happen on the following broken platforms/devices:
Linksys/Sipura aka Cisco
ShoreTel
Sonus/L3
We will try to fix it but some of the devices on this list are so broken who knows what will happen..
“
when fs gets the invite, but then does a core dump when it tries to:

<anti-action application="bridge" data="sofia/${regext_sipprofile}/$ {dialed_extension}%${domain_name}"/>


Below are some of the traces and info output from before the core dump happens.

I see this when I run gdb on the dumpfile.

#0 0xb7e194d4 in switch_ivr_originate (session=0xb74640a8, bleg=0xb572b0b0, cause=0xb572b0ac, bridgeto=0xb74a1b18 "sofia/voxwan/ 8154%172.16.1.3", timelimit_sec=30, table=0xb7efcfc0, cid_name_override=0x0, cid_num_override=0x0, caller_profile_override=0x0, ovars=0x0, flags=<value optimized out>) at src/switch_ivr_originate.c:1609 1609 if (switch_core_codec_init(&write_codec,

(gdb) frame 1
#1  0xb6df48f5 in ?? () from /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_dptools.so


I wonder if anybody else has seen this behavior?

This happens when the destination phone is also G.722 capable (policom). If I change the “frame per packet” setting in the softphone to 2 – All works OK (but the default is 1 – so cant risk allowing G.722 if it’s going to core dump fs if a user make a wrong configuration)


Best Regards

Keith

_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Reply via email to