limit_hash uses a faster data structure then limit but works the same way for tne end-user.
viens sur IRC si t'as des questions en francais =) Math On 17-Mar-09, at 3:06 AM, rod wrote: > Hi, > > not too hard :p > but it's just a bad habit when I write in my native language > (french). I > guess that this spelling is not too common for english speaker. > > I'll do my best next time to write it correctly. > > @tamas > you are right, we could use limit_hash the same way as limit when not > specifying the /rate > > @Mathieu > did you suggest limit_hash is more scalable than limit? But I don't > understand why limit_hash is not suitable for data replication (DB > lookup for limit and memory for limit_hash??), even if I don't know > how > to do it with limit. > > regards. > > Raymond Chandler wrote: >> Tamas wrote: >> >>> My guess is: pbm = problem :) >>> >>> >> sure, but is it really that hard to spell all the way out? >> >> -Ray >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
