Another example of a fatal issue was the optimizer in gcc was breaking
openzap code even with -O2.
Mike
On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:12 PM, dujinfang wrote:
On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
We do not support ubuntu interpid, it has at least 3 known fatal
issues not experienced by all but nonetheless enough to make us
unwilling to support it.
I use Ubuntu gutsy in production and interipid in test env. It
works well. Can you briefly explain the 3 fatal issues Anthony? It
will help me know potential risks.
It's "use at your own risk" or use the stable branch "hardy" for
any support.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Trevor Hammonds <[email protected]
> wrote:
Has there been any progress getting FreeSWITCH to build on Ubuntu
Intrepid without downgrading libtool?
I successfully built FS on intrepid. I simply done this by changing
the apt-source to Hardy and installed libtool. Obviously I changed
the apt-source back to intrepid after I installed libtool.
And, another approach. Install libtool from source should be as easy
as configure && make && make install. I done this on a new CentOS4
because the default yum install of libtool on CentOS4 is old than FS
required.
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
