Ok, I think I know where's the confusion here. Let me clarify: 1. FS run beautifully as a service - that's why I assumed it should work. 2. Skype client runs as a service very well too. 3. When running FS as a service with Skypiax (hence Skypiax as a service), Skypiax doesn't seem to find the SkypeAPI.
In the Wiki page http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Skypiax#Running_Skypiax_on_Windows_as_a_Serv ice it's says that Running Skypiax on Windows as a Service is "Not yet written" therefore I assumed it's a known limitation. Are you saying it isn't? Anyway, the farming solution you suggested should solve the problem - I'd assume. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Giovanni Maruzzelli Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 1:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Skypiax as a windows service EG: in the "farm out" scenario there will be FS talking via TCP to a "farm client" (on local machine or remote). The "farm client" talks with Skype client instances running on the same machine the "farm client" is running on. On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, UV <[email protected]> wrote: > Decoupling the Skyiax from FS will solve the problem as I assume it'll use > TCP/IP (winsock) to interface with FS - therefore, I can run it still on the > same machine but two separate sessions. yes, it uses TCP for this. So you would end up with FS (with Skypiax module) running on RDP while the Skype client instances are running as services, on the same machine (or in different machines). FS will talk to Skype client instances via TCP. Is this acceptable to you? Other question: why not running FS as a service too? If you run FS as a service and Skype clients as services, all things would works? Why you want to use RDP for? (sorry for the silly questions, I just want to understand better). > However, I think getting the Skypiax > to work as a service will be more beneficial regardless if it's decoupled or > not. What do you mean? I believe that Skypiax (as an FS module) works when FS is run as service. Your problem seems to me that you cannot run Skype instances under RDP because they cannot access the sound device. Is this correct? gm _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
