The way it works by default is that if you send a www-authenticate, we *always* try to process it. HOWEVER, we have a accept-blind-auth sofia profile param (in fact it was invented just for sipX)
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Andy Spitzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Woof! > > It is my understanding, that if I set > <param name="auth-calls" value="false"/> > in a SIP profile, it shouldn't challenge for authentication under any > circumstances. > > However, if an INVITE contains a a Proxy-Authorization header from another > proxy, Sofia DOES challenge with a 407. > > I'm aware one can set accept-blind-auth to work around this, but I'm > wondering if my understanding of auth-calls is wrong, or the behavior I'm > seeing is wrong. > > --Woof! > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:[email protected] <msn%[email protected]> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[email protected]<paypal%[email protected]> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]> iax:[email protected]/888 googletalk:[email protected]<googletalk%3aconf%[email protected]> pstn:213-799-1400
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
