That's just right down screwing with the standards... PAID is the caller id... This particular definition is from the RFCs and 3GPP docs for IMS which is why we have standardized P- headers...
Can your vendor not look at the P-Charging-Vector field? Also, From when used with PAID is more like an ANI not a CLID > From: Dale <[email protected]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:30:34 -0400 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting P-Asserted-ID to something other than the > callerid > > > Hello again, > > I wanted to first say thanks to Brain for helping me fix my from > domain issue the other day. It helped quite a bit. > > Now with more testing and talking with the vendor (please don't shoot > the messenger :) ) > > They want the caller id info in the from and the charge number/ > screening number in the P-Asserted-ID. > > I have tested this and verified that this does work like they say it > does by setting the callerid number to my charge number and setting > the from user in the gateway config to the callerid I want displayed. > But this solution doesn't scale very well. > > I know I can set the gateway option caller-id-in-from to get that part > done. But is there a way to set the P-Asserted-ID to something other > than the callerid? > > Any hints would be welcomed. > > Thanks, > > -Dale > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
