On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:21 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote: > > High quality conferencing is a difficult task, and still a research > topic. No two conferencing systems perform alike. The interesting thing > about this and other reports is that the conferencing in Freeswitch is > not very clever right now, yet people are already saying it beats > various other offerings, including long time commercial offerings.
It may well be that a simplistic implementation (noise gate, add them all up) is all that's required for dealing with small groups or, more generally, groups of any size which have a small number of active speakers at any one time: it's predictable and unlikely to introduce unpleasant side effects. --Dave _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
